Replacing Faulty Heart Devices Costs Medicare $1.5 Billion in 10 Years

On October 2nd, The New York Times posted an article titled, “Replacing Faulty Heart Devices Costs Medicare $1.5 Billion in 10 Years.” In the article, it discusses how about 73,000 people on Medicare had to have a heart device replaced because of recalls, failures, infections, or necessary upgrades. These replaces have cost Medicare $1.5 billion but also costs $140 million in out of pocket payments for patients. From 2003 to 2012 device recalls have nearly doubled, this is troubling for health officials. Not only are the patients receiving faulty devices but hospitals have to go back and collect detailed information identifying failed devices, this is an extra step officials must take in the care process.

While hospitals have no clue when they are implementing these devices, many times they are blamed for the failure of the equipment. When patients face complications they often go back to the hospital questioning what’s wrong. Like the rest of the world we live in there are constantly new technologies hoping to improve daily tasks but what is the cost? Technologies are working to cut production costs as low as they can to increase profitability but when the devices need to be replace it often costs more. This is where hospital officials need to make the decision to stick with the older and more reliable technology or to try the next best thing and hope for the best.


The New York Times Article 

Comments

  1. Mark BonicaOctober 14, 2017 at 3:22 PM

    There's something to be said for not being on the cutting edge of technology. These devices go through a lot of testing before they get FDA approval, so there's a reasonable expectation that they are safe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. MelissaOctober 18, 2017 at 7:58 PM

    Many devices are not tested for 10 years for longevity, failure of the equipment, if we waited 10 years for a potential life saving device to be approved, more lives I believe would be lost than the ones we could have potentially saved. As stated by Dr. Bonica, the FDA goes through a lengthy process as do companies in their research and development to get devices approved. The intent of these companies is not to harm, but to save lives. Additionally, many implantable devices usually have a longevity/life time given to the patients, I.E. a heart valve replacement usually has a life time of 10 years; if it is covered the first time, does that mean the insurance has/should cover it a second time? This is an ethical conversation that we could have, it comes down to pre-existing conditions and we are not sure where the future in healthcare policy is taking us, but this can lead to many great discussions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Apple Poised to Enter EHR Market?

For this blog I chose to write about an article I found titled, “Is Apple poised to enter EHR market? New patents have the industry buzzing.” In the article, it discusses how apple has been working to receive patents that allow for patients to have access to medical results and lab test at the palm of their hand. With all the electronic devices that Apple has created like, MacBook, iPad, iPhone, and Apple watches all of which are already used in healthcare settings it would only be fitting for them to progress further into the medical device field. Apple has in heart rate monitors in the new watches that will call 911 or let the wearer know they are reaching dangerous levels. If they could use these monitoring systems where would the information be stored and tracked. We are currently in a society that values technology based programs more than we ever have. If apple was able to develop products such as an electronic health record there is a high likelihood that i
Read more

Health Leader Forge Podcast Assignment

For this assignment, I chose to report on Richard Silveria the CFO of Boston Medical Center. Silveria has climbed the ladder to an executive position similarly to the way I hope to achieve in my career. He started his studies at UMass Lowell where he originally wanted to go to medical school but majored in education. After completing his undergrad at UMass Lowell, when it was time to look for a job, he decided to “cold call” Choate Symmes Hospital, which is no longer open. He was given a position at Choate Symmes teaching health relations but this job later lead to working with Information Technology. After working for Choate Symmes, Silveria moved on to work for Lawrence General Hospital where he worked on the billing cycle even without a finance background. The executive team was willing to take the risk on him and he worked hard to gather data, engage employees, and slowly started to turn around the billing system. This moment in his career was a defining one a
Read more

Harvey's Impact on Hospitals

Image
Hello for my first blog post I wanted to post about the recent situation that has burdened Houston, Texas. Hurricane Harvey has posted record numbers for rainfall with 49.2 inches of precipitation. Harvey has destroyed neighborhoods, schools, and even hospitals are at risk. Hospitals have had to cancel appointments and surgeries and at some hospitals have had to move patients out to receive care. Unfortunately for these hospitals the worst has yet to come because even after the precipitation goes down  people who have lost homes and jobs avoid medical treatment or seek charitable care. From a management stand point these hospitals are going to have to make some controversial decisions. One of the biggest decisions I feel that is going to have to be made is the care that is given after the precipitation has gone down. Food sources and drinking water have been contaminated, which leads to several problems such as waterborne disease like Cholera and typhoid, and foodbo
Read more